• About F & S
  • Our Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
      • litigateLitigation Services
      • REGRegulatory Matters
      • Commercial Transactions
      • Labor & Employment
      • General Counsel Service
      • Government & Passenger Rail
    • Close
  • Our Clients
  • Alerts & Analysis
  • About F & S
  • Our Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
      • litigateLitigation Services
      • REGRegulatory Matters
      • Commercial Transactions
      • Labor & Employment
      • General Counsel Service
      • Government & Passenger Rail
    • Close
  • Our Clients
  • Alerts & Analysis
F&S Delivers Illinois State Court win on Federal Preemption

F&S Delivers Illinois State Court win on Federal Preemption

  • On August 22, 2019

By Bradon J. Smith

“We understand federal preemption too!” a Cook County court seemed to say in granting summary judgment to a railroad against a landowner’s action to condemn track on Chicago’s South Side.

In Calumet Realty, L.P. and Maryland Pig Services v. Chicago Rail Link L.L.C. & OmniTrax, Inc.No. 16-CH-3780, (Cook Co. Chanc. Div. Jun. 5, 2019) the Circuit Court of Cook County, found that a landowner’s state law action to both (1) declare a rail line traversing the landowner’s parcel to be abandoned and (2) enjoin the railroad from using the line, was preempted by the exclusive federal jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”).  The court adopted Fletcher & Sippel’s argument that when the remedy associated with state law property rights affects the federally-recognized and regulated right of a railroad to operate, the court’s ability to provide a remedy is preempted by the exclusive jurisdiction of the STB—even if the railroad has not used it track in many years.

The court wrote: “the Court recognizes that the Track is a federally-regulated railroad line and the result Plaintiffs seek in this action is to wholly prevent Defendants from using the Track, now and in the future.  Even though Defendants have not used the Track for over twenty years, the case law is clear that any type of separation between a common carrier and federally-regulated railroad lines is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the STB.”

As demonstrated in this matter and another recent decision, Coulas v. Belt Railway of Chicago, 13-CH-28409 (Cook Co. Chanc. Div. Mar. 9, 2019), state courts are increasingly aware of the applicability of federal preemption principles to railroads and are applying them.  This is a positive development in the efficient and economical administration of disputes over railroad property.

Michael J. Barron was counsel of record to defendants in Calumet Realty, L.P. and Maryland Pig Services v. Chicago Rail Link L.L.C. & OmniTrax, Inc. Michael W. Schumate and Bradon J. Smith assisted him in the matter.

 

 

 

 

 

 
Our Recent Blog Post
  • FRA ISSUES FINAL CREW SIZE RULE
  • The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act: Proceed at Restricted Speed
  • ORAL FLUID TESTING:  A HEADS UP TO REVIEW YOUR POLICIES!!!
  • Pregnant Workers’ Fairness Act: Congress’ New Rule on Work-Place Accommodations for Pregnant Workers
  • PHMSA is proposing new rules on train consist and emergency response information
  • FRA PROPOSED RULES FOR CERTIFICATION OF RAILROAD DISPATCHERS AND SIGNAL EMPLOYEES
  • Final Rule on Oral specimen drug testing
  • Emergency Escape Breathing Apparatus NPRM
  • FLETCHER & SIPPEL ADDS AND PROMOTES ATTORNEYS
  • FRA Rule Amendments on Glazing
  • BNSF Loses Illinois Biometric Privacy Lawsuit, Jury’s Verdict Exposes Railroad to up to $228 Million in Damages
  • Bill Sippel
  • NPRM on reflectorization
  • USDOT Solicits Applicants for Crossing Safety Enhancement Grants
  • BNSF California Embargo

EEOC’s Response to #MeToo

Previous thumb

BLET Creates New Short Line Department

Next thumb
Scroll

Chicago, Il
29 North Wacker Dr, Suite 800
Chicago, IL 60606-3208

(312) 252-1500 (Main)
(312) 252-2400 (Fax)

Jackson, MS
4400 Old Canton Road, Suite 220,
Jackson, MS 39211-5982

(601) 414-6009 (Main)
(601) 414-6016 (Fax)



Privacy Policy

©2023 Fletcher & Sippel LLC.  Branding & Designed by Menagery, Inc.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}