• About F & S
  • Our Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
      • litigateLitigation Services
      • REGRegulatory Matters
      • Commercial Transactions
      • Labor & Employment
      • General Counsel Service
      • Government & Passenger Rail
    • Close
  • Our Clients
  • Alerts & Analysis
  • About F & S
  • Our Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
      • litigateLitigation Services
      • REGRegulatory Matters
      • Commercial Transactions
      • Labor & Employment
      • General Counsel Service
      • Government & Passenger Rail
    • Close
  • Our Clients
  • Alerts & Analysis
7th Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment for Railroad—Plaintiff Failed to Produce Evidence of Medical Causation

7th Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment for Railroad—Plaintiff Failed to Produce Evidence of Medical Causation

  • On April 1, 2019

Jim Helenhouse of Fletcher & Sippel LLC obtained an affirmance of the District Court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Wisconsin Central Ltd.

On February 1, 2019, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit affirmed the Eastern District of Wisconsin’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the railroad in Kopplin v. Wisconsin Central Ltd., 914 F.3d 1099 (7th Cir. 2019). The 7th Circuit found plaintiff did not offer expert testimony needed to establish that the alleged incident caused plaintiff’s injury.

Kopplin claimed he suffered left traumatic medial epicondylitis as a result of attempting to operate a switch in January 2014. He asserted a “run of the mill” negligence claim and a negligence per se claim premised on an alleged defect in the switch in violation of 49 C.F.R § 213.135. The District Court granted summary judgment finding plaintiff provided no evidence that the railroad was on notice of a defect in the switch and further finding plaintiff’s argument that the switch should have been inspected more frequently was precluded by the railroad’s compliance with federal regulations. The District Court also barred plaintiff’s treater from offering causation testimony.

While the focus of the briefs and the oral argument on appeal was on whether POM Wonderful overturned the 7th Circuit’s Waymire decision, the 7th Circuit never reached that issue. Rather, the Court affirmed the District Court’s decision on the basis that plaintiff did not have admissible evidence to prove causation.

Plaintiff argued that no expert medical causation evidence was needed in a traumatic injury case. The 7th Circuit disagreed. After viewing the video capturing the incident from the locomotive cab, the Court concluded plaintiff’s injury was not an obvious traumatic injury because the video showed no obvious point of injury. Moreover, plaintiff continued to work for several hours before reporting the injury.

The 7th Circuit further opined that, because plaintiff’s doctor did not perform a differential etiology by investigating other potential causes to the injury, plaintiff did not offer any admissible evidence under Rule 702 establishing the incident caused the injury. The 7th Circuit similarly rejected the treater’s affidavit, submitted after his deposition and in response to a summary judgment motion, wherein he attempted, for the first time, to definitively state the incident caused the elbow injury. The court reasoned that an affidavit drafted after conflicting unambiguous deposition testimony is not admissible at the summary judgment stage to create an issue of fact. The 7th Circuit further held that, even if the treater’s affidavit could be considered, it disclosed new opinions which were untimely, as they were disclosed far beyond the deadlines for expert disclosures.

 
Our Recent Blog Post
  • FRA ISSUES FINAL CREW SIZE RULE
  • The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act: Proceed at Restricted Speed
  • ORAL FLUID TESTING:  A HEADS UP TO REVIEW YOUR POLICIES!!!
  • Pregnant Workers’ Fairness Act: Congress’ New Rule on Work-Place Accommodations for Pregnant Workers
  • PHMSA is proposing new rules on train consist and emergency response information
  • FRA PROPOSED RULES FOR CERTIFICATION OF RAILROAD DISPATCHERS AND SIGNAL EMPLOYEES
  • Final Rule on Oral specimen drug testing
  • Emergency Escape Breathing Apparatus NPRM
  • FLETCHER & SIPPEL ADDS AND PROMOTES ATTORNEYS
  • FRA Rule Amendments on Glazing
  • BNSF Loses Illinois Biometric Privacy Lawsuit, Jury’s Verdict Exposes Railroad to up to $228 Million in Damages
  • Bill Sippel
  • NPRM on reflectorization
  • USDOT Solicits Applicants for Crossing Safety Enhancement Grants
  • BNSF California Embargo

Wisconsin Court of Appeals Finds City Citations for Crossing Blockages Preempted

Next thumb
Scroll

Chicago, Il
29 North Wacker Dr, Suite 800
Chicago, IL 60606-3208

(312) 252-1500 (Main)
(312) 252-2400 (Fax)

Jackson, MS
4400 Old Canton Road, Suite 220,
Jackson, MS 39211-5982

(601) 414-6009 (Main)
(601) 414-6016 (Fax)



Privacy Policy

©2023 Fletcher & Sippel LLC.  Branding & Designed by Menagery, Inc.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}